The game is fine, but needs some minor tweaks
by John Furgele
This year, baseball is trying to speed up a timeless game. And, it’s not for the fans at the ballpark, who generally don’t keep of track of time when they’re there. It’s for the couch person, the person who wants to sit down at 7 pm, watch a baseball game and then be in bed shortly after 10 pm. Last year, with the average game running 3 hours 7 minutes, that didn’t happen. Personally, if they enforced rules rather than resort to timers and clocks, the games might have been shorter.
Baseball—like all sports—has problems. Foremost is the length of the season. The attention span of Americans has become shorter and shorter. You can blame high speed internet, online shopping, Smart and I phones, and the fact that we are addicted to them; but the bottom line is that it’s tough to devote three hours to anything unless it’s really, really important. TV ratings will never be great when there are 162 games over 26 weekends of action. If you miss one game, there are 161 more and then one becomes 30 and before long, it’s Thanksgiving. Basketball and hockey with their bloated 82 game seasons also suffer from this, so let’s not ignore them either.
Another problem with baseball is the sports refusal to showcase all the teams. They prefer to give you Yankees-Red Sox and Dodgers-Giants regardless of record and even mid-season, they refuse to alter that strategy. In the NFL, they flex games, so if it’s Week 14 and the Eagles and Giants are 5-8, that game gets dumped from prime time for a better one. How many times did ESPN show you the Royals last year?
Offense is down in baseball and the sport continues to play by two sets of rules, even though there is interleague play every day. It’s time to ask for forgiveness from the purists and make the National League adopt the designated hitter. As mentioned, offense is down, and pitchers have enough trouble staying healthy just pitching. We don’t ask the field goal kicker to punt anymore, why make the pitcher bat? And, asking the American League pitcher to bat in a National League park is almost inhumane.
Watching the Yankees play the Red Sox 19 times and for that matter, Tigers-Indians is just too much. Baseball likes to think that’s what everybody wants, but it’s simply not true anymore. And, it’s also not fair. In the old days, where just the division winners made the playoffs, it made sense, but with two wild cards, the unbalanced schedule doesn’t cut it anymore. If the Yankees are competing against the Red Sox AND the Mariners, then they should have equal cracks at both teams. When baseball instituted the wild card in 1995, people scoffed, but after the Yankees and Mariners hooked up in that memorable Division Series—won by Seattle in five games—the skeptics and the scoffing stopped.
Baseball should steal something from the English Premier League and get out the table. Forget about the archaic divisions, and eliminate them. Line the American League and National League teams up 1 thru 16 and have a go at it. That’s right, 1 thru 16 because baseball needs to expand by two teams to get to 32. Put an National League team in Mexico City (18 million people) and an American League one in Montreal, a city you abandoned and divorced well before 2005 when they moved.
This would create a 16 team table and the top five or even six would make the playoffs. You can say what you what about expanding playoffs, but that’s really what America enjoys. Most of us monitor the regular season, but many of us watch the playoffs. We love the sense of urgency because as previously stated, our attention spans are short.
Montreal would flourish in the American League because they would have natural rivalries with Toronto, Boston and the Yankees and Mexico City would fare well with Miami, Arizona and San Diego. The table creates fairness because to make the playoffs you would get equal cracks at your opponents.
The table plan would eliminate interleague play on a nightly basis, obviously with an even number teams, it isn’t necessary. If I were the king, I would eliminate interleague play altogether because the Giants aren’t competing against the Yankees for the playoffs. If that was done, each team would play opponents an average of 10.8 times per season. My math skills notwithstanding, that would be tinkered with to make it 162. The Yankees would still play the Red Sox 11 times per year, but they would get the same amount of games against the Detroit Tigers and Oakland A’s.
If interleague play is maintained, league teams could play each other 10 times, leaving 12 games to play teams from the other league. The NFL, NBA and NHL have interconference games, so it wouldn’t be a bad thing to keep it going in baseball. However, forcing Yankee fans to watch Mike Napoli 19 times and Robinson Cano just six, to me, doesn’t make a lot of sense.
Think about the table. You could take the top five teams for the playoffs, have 4 play 5 in the one game wild card, or, you could take the top six teams and give the top two teams a bye (rewarding the regular season) and have 3 play 6 and 4 play 5 in preferably a best of three. The NFL has 32 teams and takes 12 for the playoffs and before long, it will be 14. The playoffs are what get people excited. The ratings soar and the interest goes from marginal to substantial. The regular season serves a great purpose. It is a product and it provides entertainment for millions of people, but Americans can’t get enough of postseason action.
Few products can survive without evolution. Ketchup and mustard are two, but the mantra of change or die has never been more relevant. The great thing about the new baseball plan is that after 15 years, you could change it again. Nothing has to be permanent, but why not practice other ideas? Doing so will certainly at the very least, generate a lot of talk and buzz and even gain some new fans, which is the ultimate goal of any sport.